Hillary. Projecting.

Hillary Clinton: “Right-Wing Extremists Already Have A Plan To Literally Steal The Next Presidential Election”

If she were serious, and constrained by logic, she would be supporting some voting process which would:

    1) Ensure every voter is a) a citizen, b) who they say they are, c) not deceased, d) registered in a single state (yes, c and d are redundant with b, but Jocelyn Benson isn’t the only Dem SecState who had to be sued to purge voter rolls of dead people);

    2) Ensure ballot integrity. Meaning a) no illegitimate vote (see 1) is counted, b) polling places are closely monitored by both major parties without interference, c) voting machine software is open source, d) no unsolicited mail in ballots are sent (for example, to the P.O Boxes of vacant lots), e) ballot harvesting is outlawed, f) military ballots are counted, if properly postmarked, in any state where the number of military personnel could potentially change the outcome, even when delivered a month after election day.

That would be, literally, a good start on stopping ‘election theft.’ The only thing on that list about which reasonable might disagree is voter ID.

Therein lies a problem. Some of the people putatively portrayed as reasonable by the legacy media (Stacy Abrams, Joe Biden), still invoke Jim Crow laws as a reason to suppress the votes of living citizens by insisting deceased and/or non-citizens have a right to dilute legitimate voter rolls.

We are substantially past the Jim Crow era.

On the other hand, we are not past ballot fraud. Technology and the relaxing of ballot verification have made it easier than ever. No one worried about ‘election theft’ would countenance it. Much less promote it.

I won’t go into the simple utilitarian argument that voter ID is a much smaller threat to the Republic (it is not a Democracy) than violating the other restraints I have mentioned. You could look this up and form your own opinion.

Given Hillary’s history, do you think her advice is credible? Or is it partisan political maneuvering and personal spite?

Let’s hear your proposal, Ms. Rodham. Does it involve Sid “Vicious” Blumnenthal as Federal Election Czar?

The pre-theft of election plots, like suppression of the Hillary email story, and the Hunter Biden laptop story, is left to another post.

Vote NO on Michigan Proposal 2

It Destroys Michigan’s Election Integrity

An email from The Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC).

The deceptively positive sounding “Promote the Vote 2022” is the campaign behind Proposal 2. It a dark money-funded attempt to write many of the worst things about the 2020 election disaster into the Michigan Constitution. This will result in making unsupervised voting, restricted election audits, and third-party funding of elections permanent in Michigan.

Here are just a few of the awful provisions contained in Proposal 2:

  • It would make the now infamous ballot drop boxes permanent, taxpayer-funded, and everywhere. This will make illegal ballot harvesting and ballot trafficking even easier! And it will cost your township or city to install and to monitor these boxes — more of your tax dollars!
  • It would let people vote without photo ID. One of the biggest problems in 2020 will never be fixed.
  • It would restrict election audits to government entities only. Sorry, no independent audits by concerned citizens allowed.
  • It would allow funding of — and thus control of — elections by outside organizations directed by billionaires.
  • It would promote and facilitate unsolicited absentee voting — perhaps THE biggest single problem in 2020. When a state is awash in mail-in ballots, the job of the fraudster is much easier.
  • Please consider the consequences — this would be the end of free and fair elections!

    VOTE NO on Proposal 2.

    Please share this with family and friends.

    Proposal 2 does promote voting. By making it easier to cast illegal votes. It makes fair and free elections impossible.

    The wording of Proposal 2 is highly deceptive:

    Proposal 2 would amend the state constitution to add provisions regarding elections. This amendment would recognize the fundamental right to vote without harassing conduct. Require military or overseas ballots be counted if postmarked by election day. Provide voters right to verify identity with photo ID or signed statement. Provide voter right to single application to vote absentee ballot in all election. Require state funded absentee ballot drop boxes and postage for absentee applications and ballots. Provide that only election officials may conduct post-election audits. Require nine days of early in person voting. Allow donations to fund elections, which must be disclosed. Require canvass boards certify elections based only on the official records of votes cast.

    If you aren’t just thrilled

    …with both the Republicans and the Democrats, you should vote NO on MI Proposal 18-3.

    How Third Parties Are Getting Screwed This Election Season

    As that link points out, it’s not only straight ticket voting which locks in the status quo, but that is one good way to make sure your only choice will continue to be between the Trumps and the Clintons of the world.

    The straight ticket voting option is one of the things Prop 3 cements into the Michigan Constitution.