A New York City high school which produces makers is under attack by looters.
No Ethnic Group Owns Stuyvesant. All New Yorkers Do.
“Admission to Stuyvesant was and remains determined by a single test available to all middle school students in the city. There are no soft criteria for admission: no interviews, no favoritism for legacies, no strings to be pulled. It’s all about whether you do well on the test, which best determines whether or not you can do the academic work.
You would think that Mayor Bill de Blasio would celebrate Stuyvesant as the crown jewel of the city’s school system. Instead, he has announced a plan that will destroy it in all but name.
This month, the mayor said he would seek legislation that would eliminate the test completely. Instead, he’d guarantee automatic admission to Stuyvesant — and the seven other specialized high schools in the city — for the top students at every middle school, regardless of their abilities.
The mayor says he is trying to address what is undoubtedly a heartbreaking problem: the gross underrepresentation of black and Latino students at Stuyvesant and schools like it. In 2016 black and Latino students constituted 44 percent of the kids who took the test (and 65 percent of the New York City school population). Yet they make up just 4 percent of Stuyvesant students and 15 percent of students at the specialized high schools overall.
But the mayor’s solution is no solution at all.
For one thing, his plan seems purposely oblivious to his administration’s utter failure to prepare students across the city for the admissions test — and for a school as challenging as Stuyvesant. In nearly one quarter of the city’s public middle schools, zero seventh graders scored at the advanced level on the annual New York State Mathematics Exam in 2017. Mr. de Blasio would send the top 7 percent of students at every middle school to the specialized high schools, but at 80 middle schools — or one out of every six — not even 7 percent of seventh graders passed the state math exam.”
Mayor de Blasio is insisting on equal outcomes for Middle School students. Never mind if there aren’t 7% of a school’s graduates who are even competent (much less excellent) in math, he’s going to insist they be placed in a group where they will certainly struggle. If the school system for which the Mayor is responsible produces innumerate graduates, he’ll just lower the definition of numeracy.
I’ll bet vanishingly few of those 44% taking the entrance exam were students at the 80 schools where not even 7% can pass the state math exam. Graduating with no math competence is the problem, and throwing those kids into an advanced program is doing them no favor.
It’s not a numeracy problem to the Mayor, it’s a melanin content problem. The breakdown of the freshman admittees at Stuyvesant:
Asian — 613
White — 151
Hispanic — 27
Black — 10
I wonder how the 37 black and brown students who passed the entrance exam feel about Mr. de Blasio’s proposal. They represent 4.62% of the freshman class. We know that 44% of the aspirants who took the test in 2016 were black and brown. That means over 10% of them passed. Will the 3% who made it based on a meritocratic exam be denied admittance in favor of the new “7% from all” social justice rules?
Before those 37 graduate from Stuyvesant, dozens of kids who don’t know what a square root is may be their classmates.
One consequence is that few, if any, outcome equal, square-rootless admittees will succeed. Another is that resources will be diverted from those who could do the work, and some of them will fail when they could have succeeded. So, how long do you think it will be before de Blasio’s Equal Outcome parameters will also be applied to Stuyvesant graduates? Stuyvesant diplomas will become certificates of participation. The equal outcome will be pre-ordained graduation, whether earned or not.
If de Blasio is successful, the vast benefit this school brings to us all – equal opportunity for everyone to become better, happier, and wealthier by standing on the shoulders of merit – will vanish.
The arc of equal outcomes bends toward the lowest common denominator. A term with which Mr. de Blasio’s new Stuyvesant students will be unfamiliar.
That’s what he wants. Any other result promotes the idea that people are not interchangable parts to be arranged in life by Government whim. De Blasio’s utopian project cannot tolerate that.
On April 17th I wondered:
Is free speech under assault on college campuses? Well, some people, including President Trump, think not.
Then we have this idiot show up to assure us that to think free speech is in danger on campuses (including those where e you can’t be sure using the made up pronoun “zir” is the only way to avoid administrative persecution) is a vast delusional right-wing conspiracy.
The vastness is only limited by the number of people who weren’t conscripted for the ‘[L]ong march through the institutions.’
Russia’s hidden hand in the Florida pipeline protests was extensive, according to sources familiar with the operations. At least eight Russian accounts, most tied to the troll farm known as the Internet Research Agency, sent at least 16 social media messages excoriating the Sabal Trail pipeline or retweeting messages from one of its most prominent opponents, a frequent guest on RT. The tweets were sent to a total of more than 40,000 followers as well as anyone else who saw them via hashtags.
This is just one example of Russian manipulation of useful Green idiots. The Russians do a lot of this in Canada, too.
If we’re worried about Russian election shenanigans, we should be equally concerned about this tampering. It’s gone on longer, involved more money, is intended to reduce US national security and divide Americans, while boosting Russian oil revenues and world-political influence.
“My armed guards aren’t killing children and don’t have semi automatic weapons.“
— Chelsea Handler (@chelseahandler) March 28, 2018
I’m not sure who she is, but she obviously thinks she has a right to physical protection. I agree with that bit. Unfortunately, I can’t afford armed guards.
My armed guard (me) sometimes carries a semi-automatic handgun and sometimes a revolver. In both cases, one squeeze of the trigger produces one discharge. The main difference is that my usual semi-auto carry holds 7 rounds and my usual revolver carry holds only 5.
If I were hired to defend someone else, I’d be less concerned about comfortable carry. I’d be much less concerned that someone could tell I had a firearm: Maybe it’s a deterrent if you realize someone has a professional armed guard you have to shoot first?
Since I’d be more concerned about multiple assailants, I’d definitely carry something that held 10 or more rounds: I.e., a larger semi-auto. If Ms. Handler’s guards aren’t doing so, then she should fire them.
I’m not shooting any children, either.
So. She thinks she should be allowed to pay someone else to defend her, and that I should not be allowed to defend myself.
No. If I can’t defend myself with a gun, Ms. Handler can’t be allowed to let someone else defend her with one.
And, you know what? If I thought I needed armed guards, I’d still carry my own. Especially then.
While Cathy Newman was giving Jordan Peterson the third degree, she suggested that the non-existent “pay gap” could be eliminated by enforcing more feminine traits in the workplace. Four minute snippet:
Well, Cathy’s got Evergreen State College graduate Jennifer Armbrust on-board. Armbrust’s degree is in Critical Theory.
Here’s the condensed syllabus of her Feminist Business School.
[C]apitalism is an “economy that values masculine traits” such as “meritocracy,” “competition,” and “individualism.”
Shunning the “profit seeking motive” of traditional commerce, the Feminist Business School advocates that businesswomen adopt more “feminine traits” such as “gratitude,” “intimacy,” and “connecting with nature.”
“The feminine economy proposes a new set of values and redistribution of money and power based on feminine principle…”
I think this qualifies under Peterson’s comment, “That doesn’t predict success in the workplace.”
Well, maybe in Venezuela. The bar’s pretty low there.
David Thompson’s catalogue of SJW tripe (next post down) is a good start. However, we can’t close the list of 2017 SJW nonsense until at least mid-January, to allow time for reporting to catch up with the continuous sludge deluge.
Reconcile this with #MeToo, please:
University of Iowa derecognizes Christian club because of ‘sexual moral conduct’ rules for leaders: suit
The anti-science Professor Millar:
Feminist Professor Praises ‘Happy Abortions’ in New Book
The aptly named Professor Ponce:
Prof urges ‘abolition of white democracy’ during lecture
And, for the lifetime achievement award, there’s Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D, umb):
‘I’m a queen and I demand to be treated like a queen!’
“And I think it’s unfortunate that we are designing — that we are designing public policy in a way that, you know, comes down to how you voted in an election,”
‘I think it’s unfortunate that we live in a democratic Republic where “those people” can vote.’
There, fixed that for her.
[T]he electoral college will have a lasting legacy on all of our lives through climate change. The combination of two administrations headed by presidents who lost the popular vote has and will slow our progress down, and that delay contributes to an ever worsening global climate problem.
You needn’t bother to RTWT.