Real women know their place

“When you’re young, you’re thinking, “Where are the boys? The boys are with Bernie.”
-Feminist superhero Gloria Steinem, on why young women aren’t flocking to Mrs. Bill.

I see a bumper sticker: Horny co-eds for Bernie!

“And just remember — there’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help each other.”
-Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, at a Mrs. Bill’s campaign event.

Ms. Albright should know.

“Sen. Sanders is the only person who I think would characterize me, a woman running to be the first woman president, as exemplifying the establishment.”
-Mrs. Bill on why she can’t possibly be “establishment:” Because she has a vagina.

Mrs. Bill? Bernie is far from the only one, or Gloria Steinem wouldn’t have been sticking her foot in her mouth up to the knee.

“Sometimes when a woman speaks out, some people think it’s shouting.”
-Mrs. Bill on her calm demeanor involving gun control.

Sometimes, when a woman screeches for years on a topic, she calls it speaking out.

“Bernie is building a movement, we’re told (with little evidence of lasting organization, by the way), but it’s a movement whose loudest advocates are entitled young men who heap the vilest abuse on women who don’t deign to join it.”
-Joan Walsh, writing at The Nation in Jan 2016

It’s a movement lasting a bit too long for Mrs. Bill’s comfort.

“First of all, Clinton only won the women’s vote narrowly in 2008, besting Barack Obama by just 2 percent…

The drop in Clinton’s support among women also makes sense given that we know women don’t merely support female candidates just because they’re women.”
-Joan Walsh (same one), writing at Salon in Sep 2015

No, they support female candidates solely because of the candidate’s sex because they’re being bullied by feminist SJW hacks who can’t remember what they write after a few months.

Advantage Sanders

Dem sen: Sanders has no ‘interest in foreign policy’

Democratic senator and top Clinton surrogate Claire McCaskill bashed rival Bernie Sanders on the day of the Iowa caucus as lacking the foreign policy chops needed to serve as commander-in-chief…

“He doesn’t have experience and hasn’t shown a great deal of interest in foreign policy, hasn’t really demonstrated the breadth and depth of knowledge you need to lead this country at a dangerous time.”

McCaskill has a point. Mrs. Bill’s interest in sharing state secrets with foreign intelligence agencies is well documented, and we are in a dangerous time.

Thanks, in no small part, to Mrs. Bill.

If only she’d shown a lack of interest in foreign policy, our national security wouldn’t be compromised, Libya wouldn’t be breeding ISIS, four Americans might not have died in Benghazi and she wouldn’t be on the verge of indictment.

At this point

Official: Some Clinton emails ‘too damaging’ to release

The intelligence community has deemed some of Hillary Clinton’s emails “too damaging” to national security to release under any circumstances, according to a U.S. government official close to the ongoing review. A second source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, backed up the finding.

I find it hard to believe that emails intelligence experts declare ““too damaging” to national security to release under any circumstances” can possibly be evidence of mere internecine bureaucratic catfights.

Mrs. Bill says I’m mistaken: Hillary Campaign: Withholding of Emails Just ‘Over-Classification Run Amok’

Hillary Clinton’s campaign insisted today that the former secretary of State wants the release of more than 20 emails determined to have contained top-secret information, calling the withholding “over-classification run amok.”

Indeed: What difference, at this point, does it make? Any interested foreign intelligence services already read them.

It’s a vast intelligence agency conspiracy.

The vast Clinton co-conspiracy

On January 7th, 1999, the United States Senate began the impeachment trial of President William J. Clinton. The President had been impeached by the House for lying under oath and obstructing justice.

His semantic gymnastics over the meaning of the word “is,” and his contention that while performing cunnilingus might have constituted “having sex,” being fellated by a twenty-something intern in the Oval Office didn’t, secured his acquittal by the Senate. But his troubles with women weren’t over.

In April 1999, President Clinton was held in contempt of court by Judge Susan Webber Wright for “intentionally false” testimony in (Paula) Jones v. Clinton. He was fined $90,000 for giving false testimony. Jones’ suit was eventually settled and included an $850,000 payment from Clinton.

In April 2000, the Arkansas Supreme Court suspended his law license. In order to avoid disbarment, he agreed to a five-year suspension and a $25,000 fine (January, 2001). In October 2001, Clinton’s U.S. Supreme Court law license was suspended.

Bill Clinton’s lies weren’t about sex, they were about what he’d done to women. This couldn’t possibly have been news to Mrs. Bill, since it had been going on since at least his 1974 Arkansas Congressional campaign.

A discussion of Bill Clinton’s behavior from a February, 2012 PBS documentary, Clinton:

Narrator: To make matters worse, Hillary had to deal with Bill’s constant womanizing.

Paul Fray, [1974 Arkansas Congressional] Campaign Manager: I mean you got to understand at one time there was at least 25 women per day coming through there trying to find him, and I’d tell them he’s out on the road, you know and they’d get out the door, but lord it was bad. Bad, bad, bad, bad, bad.

Marla Crider, [who claims to have had an affair with Clinton] Campaign Aide: He draws women in and they are literally mesmerized by this man. It was absolutely like fly to honey. And he needed that. He needed that kind of adoration. I don’t think there’s any question that Hillary was hurt, whether it was me or anyone else.

Narrator: Despite Bill’s infidelities, Hillary decided to stay in Arkansas and dedicate herself to their mutual goals.

Emphasis mine.

Any later sympathy for Hillary would seem misplaced, since Bill Clinton’s predations didn’t end there, and she enabled them:

Narrator: In 1987, during his fourth term as Arkansas governor, Bill Clinton was finally ready to leap onto the national stage with a long-shot run for the presidency. In July, he summoned the national media to Little Rock for the big announcement.

Then, abruptly, he sent them home with hardly an explanation.

Bill Clinton (archival): I need some family time, I need some personal time.

Narrator: Behind the scenes, an old weakness had come back to haunt him.

Gail Sheehy, Writer: Just the day before the press conference when he was going to announce that he was going to run, Betsey Wright, his ferociously protective campaign manager, sat him down with a list of names of women and went through one after the other: how many times, where did you meet her, how likely is she to talk?

Nigel Hamilton, Writer: For each name he said, ‘Oh, she’ll never say anything.’ And Betsey Wright said, ‘But you don’t know that. You don’t understand on a national scale, people will investigate — your opponents will investigate it. The media will investigate it. And the problem is, we’re not just talking about you. We’re talking about your wife, Hillary; we’re talking about your child, Chelsea.’ She said, ‘I don’t think you can run.’

Betsey Wright, Chief of Staff: I mean, it just became clear that night it was not the time for him to do it. It just was not the time. He felt for quite a while that, that probably was the last real chance he would ever have to run for president. That was it, it was over. You know, where would he go now that he wasn’t gonna run for president? What could he do in the future? I think that over the next few months that became a tough time for them.

Mrs. Bill was Mr. Bill’s co-vilifier of women and co-conspirator. The difference is, she wasn’t under oath when she lied.

What’s going on in Oregon?

This is a must read: Full Story on What’s Going on In Oregon.

Take your blood pressure medication first.

What’s being done to the Hammonds demonstrates what happens when property rights are disregarded.

It’s worth pointing out that presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton would both approve of this at-gun-point expropriation.

The Other Club noted the foundational nature of property rights just the other day: Property, morality and religion.

Protecting us from cattle futures*

…and preparing to force all your savings into T-Bills. NYMag.com:

Hillary Clinton has an opinion piece in the New York Times on her plans to rein in Wall Street and protect the public from excessive risk-taking.

*In case you’ve forgotten – Hillary Clinton Turned $1,000 Into $99,540, White House Says