New York Times blogger Timothy Egan, in a post titled The Clown and the Cop, attempts to demonstrate why “Tea Party” types are ignoramuses whose priorities are fatally skewed because of addiction to FOX News. Instead, he demonstrates over-immersion in the Statist echo chamber, and reveals a general allergy to principle.
The first Clowns of the title are GSA employees who dropped nearly a million dollars on a party in Vegas. The Cop is the guy the GOP wants to “put on the street,” and not in an employed way. In between there’s mention of a $642 billion dollar defense appropriations bill (“$8 billion more than the Defense Department asked for.“).
These introductory themes are somewhat loosely coupled by Egan’s disdain and blind faith.
- Disdain for the GOP’s hatred of public employees in general, and Mitt Romney’s deplorable views in particular.
- Blind faith that Barack Obama is not responsible for anything that happens on his watch.
Oh, and there’s a slap or 3 for FOX News – really for anyone possessed of the temerity to disagree with the NYT narrative.
Egan: [M]ost people are unaware that the Republican majority, the same politicians who rode into office in 2010 (on a pledge of not spending beyond our means, voted to run up the deficit last month on behalf of those parochial projects.
The Republican majority? Egan is apparently unaware that the Democrats control the Senate and the White House as he writes, and in 2010 also controlled the House, where they, like the Democrat Senate, were busy not passing budgets.
Egan: “[Obama] has been stymied by a Congress that wants to end his presidency by sabotaging the economy”
The Democrat majority Senate has a poor record in resisting this sabotage. It voted 0-0 for a budget in 2010 (no budget was considered in the Democrat House or Democrat Senate). The president’s proposed budgets were defeated in the Democrat Senate 97-0 (2011) and 99-0 (2012). The Democrat Senate has not performed their legal budgetary responsibility since April of 2009.
The president has tried to kill the Keystone pipeline, encouraged the EPA to classify carbon dioxide as a pollutant (Obama’s stated plan was that electricity rates “would necessarily skyrocket”), conducted withering class warfare against job creators, wasted tens of billions picking “winners” like Solyndra, and made investors wary by demonstrating his willingness to ignore the rule of law: The 100% loss he decreed for GM and Chrysler bondholders, the shipment of firearms to criminals in another sovereign state and subsequent coverup, and suspension of immigration law in defiance of Article Two, Section 3, Clause 4 of the United States Constitution, to name but three.
Egan: “Obama is a relative miser on the [spending] growth chart”
Only because the baseline jumped so high with TARP – which the tea party opposed. Obama, in 3 years, has run up a deficit – on top of TARP as a baseline – greater than the combined previous deficits since 1787.
Egan: on Romney “We have 145,000 more government workers under this president,” Romney said in Colorado last month. “Let’s send them back home and put you back to work.”
Again, this is simply not true.
There are, in fact, 145,000 more Federal government employees. (You have to go to the 4th from last paragraph, that is an ABC report, after all. It’s amazing they even noted it.)
Those 145,000 are the ones under president Obama. Egan disingenuously counts local and state government employees, and though that’s on whom the vast majority of the stimulus money was spent, it is not what Mr. Romney was talking about.
And while I know “The private sector is doing fine,” Mr. Egan might further have noted that job losses run 11 to 1 against the private sector – 11 private sector jobs lost for every 1 government job lost, even when you consider those state and local employees.
Mr. Egan’s general ignorance of principle, however, is his largest failure. He does not know that the clown and the defense department are of equal importance, because it is not the amount of money that is the point. It’s the venality on steroids, and in-your-face disrespect for the rule of law that are at issue for this administration. For example.