Ivermectin, say the name

Why Has “Ivermectin” Become a Dirty Word? Read that article, then decide if you will spend the time watching a two and a half hour discussion between Bret Weinstein and Dr. Pierre Kory. The video was banned by YouTube. The copy below is found on Vimeo. For now.

COVID, Ivermectin, and the Crime of the Century DarkHorse Podcast with Pierre Kory & Bret Weinstein
Skip the first 5 minutes of music.

This is information, from impeccable sources, you probably have not heard about Ivermectin. The evidence that doctors should be allowed to use Ivermectin to treat patients with CCP virus is overwhelming, as is its prophylactic property.

Every bit of evidence is insufficient if those who insist on thinking for us don’t approve it, or of its proponent’s speech: Scientist Backing Probe Into Wuhan Lab: We Waited Because We Didn’t Want ‘To Be Associated With Trump’

You can argue that nobody died because some doctors, the MSM, bureaucrats who funded gain of function research in Wuhan, and interest conflicted NGO poobahs supported the CCP in flatly denying there was evidence for a lab leak. The same cannot be said about the suppression of information on Ivermectin.

One cause of the Ivermectin suppression is Trump Derangement Syndrome. If Trump suggested something, say the Wuhan lab leak hypothesis or hydroxychloroquine, it isn’t just wrong – decent people must not discuss it.

And how did that lab leak story work out?

Question the elite narrative on Ivermectin and you’re Trump and a conspiracy theorist. “There’s no evidence because only a double blind, random clinical trial will suffice. And we’re not gonna do that.”

You have to wonder if there is a second reason. Ivermectin isn’t under patent. Any new oral medication for the CCP virus will be.
A Pill To Treat Covid-19? The US Is Betting on It