Freedom of Conscience

Freedom of Thought is under withering attack in Europe, in the UK, in Brazil, and in the US.

Respectively, by loose cannons like Thierry Breton – former Commissioner for Internal Market of the European Union; Keith “Captain Hindsight” Starmer – UK Prime Minister; Bond villain wannabe Alexandre de Moraes – Justice of Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court: And, finishing an abbreviated list, by the majority of Biden Administration flunkies. Beginning with the Marxist running for POTUS and the Maoist running for VPOTUS.

We’ll get to a more comprehensive list later in the month. Bill Gates, Mark Cuban and others need their shoutout.

I’ve been working on a post about the totalitarian speech suppression industry for a few days, but they’re so active lately I can’t keep up. So I’ll chop it up into several posts.

We’ll start today with a freshly contributed link to the brilliant Christopher Hitchens. A nonpareil defender of freedom of conscience; someone in the top 1% of courage, intellect, education, and language skill. And in the top .05% of acerbity.

Please note that this 20 minute video is from a debate in 2006. The pressure to stifle and stigmatize dissent coming from the DEI/LGBTQWERTY/Antifa/Radical Islamist/BLM/CDC-NIH-FDA-DHS-FEMA-DOJ-FBI…/IPCC tribes has exponentially increased.

“A Republic, if you can keep it.”

Today is Constitution Day

A treat from Douglas Murray, The Imperfection of America
“When the Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, Benjamin Franklin acknowledged its flaws—then defended it magnificently.”

“Much of the Strength and Efficiency of any Government, in procuring & securing Happiness to the People depends on Opinion, on the general Opinion of the Goodness of that Government as well as of the Wisdom & Integrity of its Governors. I hope therefore that for our own Sakes, as a Part of the People, and for the Sake of our Posterity, we shall act heartily & unanimously in recommending this Constitution, wherever our Influence may extend, and turn our future Thoughts and Endeavours to the Means of having it well administered.”

This election is about free speech. Nothing else much matters.

In all the world, only the United States has a Constitution preventing the government from interfering with the right to speak freely.

And it is under attack here.

It’s disallowed on our elite college campuses, actively suppressed by our FBI, hidden by every social media site excepting X.

It’s labelled ‘hate speech’ and ‘disinformation’ by the legacy media illiterati.

Our progressive politicians want to ‘regulate’ it:
https://x.com/i/status/1829651058269806658

In countries lacking a First Amendment equivalent (that would be all of them), where lip service was once paid to freedom of conscience (the Commonwealth nations, the EU) – those with “Charters of Rights and Freedoms” – the idea of free speech is being erased. In order to appease Islamists and Transgender Activists.

If we lose the right to speak here in the United States, there’s no backup.

Check this out (click through the subscription request and decide later):
a brazillian reasons to support free speech

I am thankful for Elon Musk.

Plagiarism. Fabulism. Senility.

I’ve recently read dozens of Progressive tributes to Joe Biden’s career-long selfless concern for the country, punctuated by many comparisons of his decision not to continue his Presidential campaign with George Washington’s refusal to start one.

These Biden apologists never mention Biden’s 2019 promise that he would only serve one term – as “a bridge” – apparently to assuage those who noted he was already too old to regularly climb up his basement steps.


We need to remember that Biden (quite unlike Washington) defiantly refused calls to abandon his campaign for many weeks after his disastrous debate performance. Suddenly, we are to revere him for honoring his pledge? He’s like George Washington because he was forced to quit by his party and the legacy media?

Let’s look a little more deeply at the Presidents to whom Joe could be compared based on a decision to only serve one term, their stated reasons for doing so, and ask whether they had to be forced to resign as a candidate. Who are those “very rare in the annals of history” who went before?

George Washington gets an exception from the one term pledge, because Biden’s boosters used him as the pinnacle to which Biden had ascended:
Washington believed in the importance of a peaceful transition of power and wanted to set a precedent against a life-long presidency. He was ready to return to private life at Mount Vernon.

Many of Washington’s supporters and fellow Federalists urged him to run for a third term, thinking the young country needed his continued leadership.

James K. Polk:
Polk had accomplished his major goals in one term. He believed in rotation in office and was exhausted from the demands of the presidency.

Polk had made it clear from the beginning of his presidency that he would only serve one term.

There’s little evidence of pressure on Polk to run again. He had been steadfast in his one-term pledge.

Rutherford B. Hayes:
Hayes pledged to serve only one term during his campaign, partly to help heal the nation after the contested 1876 election. He stood by this promise.

Some Republican Party members urged Hayes to reconsider his one-term pledge.

Calvin Coolidge:

After the death of his son in 1924, Coolidge fell into a depression. He famously stated, “I do not choose to run for President in 1928,” and later wrote that he no longer felt up to the task of being president.

There was considerable support within the Republican Party for Coolidge to run again in 1928. Many party leaders and supporters tried to persuade him to change his mind.

Harry S. Truman:
Truman’s popularity had significantly declined by 1952 due (mainly) to the Korean War. He claimed he had “lost the confidence” of the people and that it was time for new leadership.

Despite his low approval ratings, some Democratic Party leaders did encourage Truman to run again.

Lyndon B. Johnson:
Johnson’s decision was largely due to unrest over the Vietnam War. He said he wanted to devote his full efforts to seeking peace without the distraction of campaigning.

His poor performance in the NH primary as an incumbent certainly had… influence.

Before his announcement not to run, some party members were urging him to step aside due to the Vietnam War’s unpopularity, while others still encouraged him to run.

Joe Biden:
Citing the “existential danger” of a second Trump Presidency, which only he could counter, Biden refused to honor his pledge.

After weeks of drama, he was forced out by threat of the 25th Amendment. The closest comparison might be LBJ, certainly none of the others.

Joe Biden is well known, to put it politely… as a serial fabulist. He was forced to drop his 1988 Presidential campaign over plagiarizing a British politician’s speech. He’s been a vicious partisan attack dog for his whole career. His has made his fortune in influence peddling. He stopped his campaign because his body and his mind are failing. He was not being encouraged to ignore his one term pledge by his party or its media arm:

Comparing him to Washington is pure, insulting fantasy.

Voting Democrat in November?

Subsequent to his disastrous debate performance, Joe Biden is having an intervention a meeting today with his family and close advisors to discuss whether he should continue his Presidential campaign. These are same people who have lied to Americans about his cognitive capabilities since the 2020 ‘campaign from the basement’ strategy was devised to hide his infirmity.

A prime mover in this ‘deepest fake’ of the century is DOCTOR Jill “Edith Wilson” Biden. But she’s hardly alone. The entirety of the Democrat Party has been involved in this lie – about a man who controls the nuclear codes – for nearly 4 years.

It’s impossible the Dem oligarchy didn’t know of Joe’s infirmity; leaving 2 choices. 1) They lied as part of a byzantine electoral plot to keep Joe as a cat’s paw before dumping him. 2) They lied because thought they could get away with electing him.

Voting Democrat in November is an endorsement of one or the other. The guy they assure you should be entrusted with the nuclear football has never been in charge. They want to distract from this massive deception with their spin.

Can you trust whoever is his replacement?

The spin on Joe’s debate debacle has been nothing short of hilarious. And nothing short of deeply derpressing (not a typo). “He had a cold.” “He stutters.” “Trump lied. Biden didn’t.” “He’s fine between 10AM and 4PM.” “Trump is a threat to ‘Our Democracy-TM’.” “CNN didn’t fact check Trump.” “CNN showed Biden in a ‘bad’ camera angle.”

“Biden is of good character.” …
Ha. Ha. Ha.
Ha. Ha.

I’ll guess Beau’s widow, Hunter’s lover, won’t be at the family meeting. I doubt the family gathering will consider the granddaughter Joe does not acknowledge. I hope Hunter won’t be supplying any mood enhancers to the gathering, because he should be excluded. I’m sure DR. Jill Biden will insist on maintaining her privilege. Hope she wins.

Kamala waits in the background.

The course of human events

April 19th is the anniversary of two significant rebellions. One in America, one in Poland. Both rejected tyranny.

Poetry was written about both struggles. The contrast in the poems below about each event is especially poignant since October 7th.

Shot heard round the world. April 19, 1775.

By the rude bridge that arched the flood,
Their flag to April’s breeze unfurled,
Here once the embattled farmers stood,
And fired the shot heard round the world.

The foe long since in silence slept;
Alike the conqueror silent sleeps;
And Time the ruined bridge has swept
Down the dark stream which seaward creeps.

On this green bank, by this soft stream,
We set to-day a votive stone;
That memory may their deed redeem,
When, like our sires, our sons are gone.

Spirit, that made those heroes dare
To die, and leave their children free,
Bid Time and Nature gently spare
The shaft we raise to them and thee.
-Ralph Waldo Emerson

I’m sure the “river to sea” cadre see that poem as triumphalist, heteropatriarchal, jingoist, racist, and evil. Let’s just say it is optimistic.

Contrast it with 2 poems by Anna Swirszczynska. She was a hero. Part of the Polish Resistance in WWII, working as a military nurse during the Warsaw Uprising. Optimism does not figure into her writings.

Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. April 19, 1943.

DESPAIR
(Rozpacz)
A hand without a weapon
is raised to heaven
with its fingers it grabs heaven by the throat
and drops back.
-Anna Świrszczyńska

THE LAST POLISH UPRISING
(Ostatnie polskie powstanie)
Let us lament the hour
when it all began,
when the first shot was fired.

Let us lament the sixty-three days
and sixty-three nights
of struggle. And the hour
when it all ended.

When the place where a million people had lived
became the void that remained after a million people.
-Anna Świrszczyńska

Her first poem is an attack on a God who would allow guns in the world:

It took Świrszczyńska 30 years to write about her war experiences, and she did so in a way that makes it impossible to incorporate her account into the mainstream Polish historical narrative. … She refuses to turn her eyes away from piles of dead bodies, or to cover up the traumatic truth of war with stories of unmatched Polish bravery and patriotism. In direct, lucid, yet penetrating phrases, she demands …: “Those who gave the first order to fight/ let them now count corpses.”

More firearms would not have have made the Nazis leave the Warsaw Jews alone, and VE day was two years away. More resistance firearms WOULD have cost the Germans much, much more. If that made VE day happen one day earlier some few at Auschwitz or Buchenwald might have been saved.

The Warsaw Jews who rose against Hitler weren’t thinking of that. They were thinking they would not die on their knees in a gas chamber.

Those Jews would prefer a different interpretation of DESPAIR: We despair because we did not have the weapons.

Today, Jews have weapons. It is only because of that that the inheritors of the Nazi disease haven’t killed them all.